<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>WB Kicks Tautou's 'Chanel' Into Gear</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/28/wb-kicks-tatous-chanel-into-gear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/28/wb-kicks-tatous-chanel-into-gear/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/28/wb-kicks-tatous-chanel-into-gear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/08/coco082708.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />To me <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coco_Chanel">Coco Chanel</a> is the woman responsible for my grandmother's smell -- the regal Chanel No. 5. To others she's the woman who created the suit unfortunately immortalized by the assassination of John F. Kennedy. And to the younger crowd, she'll soon be that movie character performed by Audrey Tautou in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1035736/"><em>Coco Avant Chanel</em></a>.<br /><br />The <em>Amelie</em> actress signed on to the film <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/19/audrey-tautou-is-coco-chanel/">last year</a>, but then all news stopped and it looked like <em>Coco </em>was going to be stuck in development hell, or at least have to wait a while longer. Now <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117991188.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562"><em>Variety</em></a> reports that Warner Brothers has signed on to finance the feature and have got a plan all set. Production will start on September 15 in Paris, and should hit screens next year.<br /><br />The film will still be directed by Anne Fontaine, from the script by Anne, Camille Fontaine, and script consultant Christopher Hampton. Instead of spanning the woman's long and successful life, Tautou will get to delight in Coco's early years. And for you fashion fans out there -- Karl Lagerfeld, the art director of the House of Chanel, is supervising the wardrobe.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/28/wb-kicks-tatous-chanel-into-gear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1296120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/28/wb-kicks-tatous-chanel-into-gear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Audrey Tautou</category><category>AudreyTautou</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Coco Avant Chanel</category><category>Coco Chanel</category><category>CocoAvantChanel</category><category>CocoChanel</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Pack Ratner Heads to Paramount</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/pack-ratner-heads-to-paramount/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/pack-ratner-heads-to-paramount/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/pack-ratner-heads-to-paramount/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img width="175" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="137" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/07/ratner.jpg" alt="" />Love him or hate him, you've got to hand it to <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/brett-ratner/1321628/main">Brett Ratner</a> for keeping his career in motion. <a href="http://www.variety.com/VR1117989850.html"><em>Variety</em> brings word</a> that the hustling filmmaker plans to take his <a href="http://www.imdb.com/company/co0026594/">Rat Entertainment </a>company from New Line, where it first settled in 1996, to a first-look deal with Paramount Pictures. Ratner says the departure of New Line execs Bob Shaye and Michael Lynne in February convinced him it was time to move on. At Paramount, Ratner will probably get bigger budgets and executives more receptive to his blockbuster-ready concepts. Stating the obvious, Ratner told <em>Variety </em>he "will not be pitching art films. I want to make major tentpole movies." You don't say?<br /><br />Unless <a href="http://www.laweekly.com/news/features/brett-ratner-the-popcorn-king/16925/">you're Scott Foundas</a>, you probably balk at the idea of more Ratner movies populating the mainstream film scene, but the guy does fit the proper archetype of the classic Hollywood powerhouse. A modern day Sammy Glick, he knows how to make movies that bring out the audiences, whether or not they're any good. But maybe that determination means that, one day, Ratner will make a lot of great movies. His <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/25/brett-ratner-will-direct-playboy-hugh-hefner-biopic/">planned Hugh Hefner biopic</a> sounds promising -- or at least, appropriate.<br /><br />Still, that's a little ways off. Encouraged by his experience with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/x-men-the-last-stand/18650/main"><em>X-Men: The Last Stand</em></a>, Ratner decided he wanted to work on a new superhero franchise, so he's adapting Valiant Comics' <em>Harbinger</em>. Also in his queue: <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/beverly-hills-cop-iv/28424/main"><em>Beverly Hills Cop 4</em></a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-incredible-shrinking-man/1394700/main"><em>The Incredible Shrinking Man</em> </a>and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-boys-from-brazil/27148/main"><em>The Boys From Brazil</em></a>. Do these projects get anyone excited? Anyone at all?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/VR1117989850.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/pack-ratner-heads-to-paramount/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1272049/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/pack-ratner-heads-to-paramount/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>beverly hills cop</category><category>beverly hills cop 4</category><category>BeverlyHillsCop</category><category>BeverlyHillsCop4</category><category>bob shaye</category><category>BobShaye</category><category>brett ratner</category><category>BrettRatner</category><category>hugh hefner</category><category>HughHefner</category><category>michael lynne</category><category>MichaelLynne</category><category>new line</category><category>NewLine</category><category>paramount</category><category>rat entertainment</category><category>RatEntertainment</category><category>scott foundas</category><category>ScottFoundas</category><category>tentpole</category><category>the boys from brazil</category><category>the incredible shrin...</category><category>TheBoysFromBrazil</category><category>TheIncredibleShrin...</category><category>variety</category><category>x-men</category><category>x-men 3</category><category>x-men the last stand</category><category>X-men3</category><category>X-menTheLastStand</category><category>xmenthelaststand</category><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Christal Films Declares Bankruptcy</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/christal-films-declares-bankruptcy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/christal-films-declares-bankruptcy/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/christal-films-declares-bankruptcy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lionsgate-films/" rel="tag">Lionsgate Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/christal052108.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Another one might be biting the dust. <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i9189f73c48e7dd510b37a94d3874dcad"><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></a> posts that the Canadian distributor Christal Films, who have distributed films like <em>Congorama</em><em>, </em>has received bankruptcy protection with the Quebec Superior Court, and it has 30 days to get things in order. Things just aren't going smoothly for movie companies this year, both in Canada and stateside. (This comes on the heels of ThinkFilm closing its Toronto office.)<em><br /><br /></em>Christal suffered a big blow last year when Toronto's Maple Pictures, who have Canadian rights to Lionsgate's films, took their business to Christal's competitor, Seville Pictures. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117986204.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">Variety</a>, meanwhile, blames "changes within the film industry," and says this is limiting their profit margins. <br /><br />The company's hardships have led to 14 staff members being pink-slipped, as well as the company having to give up rights to both <em>My Blueberry Nights</em> and <em>Paris</em>. However, Christal says this bankruptcy business will not affect Christal Films Productions.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/christal-films-declares-bankruptcy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1201768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/christal-films-declares-bankruptcy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Christal Films</category><category>ChristalFilms</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Lionsgate</category><category>Maple Pictures</category><category>MaplePictures</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Capitol Films Might Want to ThinkMoney, not ThinkFilm</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/14/capitol-films-might-want-to-thinkmoney-not-thinkfilm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/14/capitol-films-might-want-to-thinkmoney-not-thinkfilm/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/14/capitol-films-might-want-to-thinkmoney-not-thinkfilm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thinkfilm/" rel="tag">ThinkFilm</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/thinkf051308.jpg" />If you had a slow Mother's Day weekend and were lurking around the net, you might have heard that David O. Russell's upcoming comedy <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1137470/"><em>Nailed</em></a> hit another snag; this one much bigger than just an actor walking off set (a snag that was NOT because of Russell!). They were shut down by the Screen Actors Guild because they didn't have enough money to pay their actors. <br /><br />You can check out the story, as it unfolded, at <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/updated-sag-orders-actors-on-david-o-russell-film-to-leave-jessica-biel-jake-gyllenhall-sidelined/">Nikki Finke's Deadline Hollywood Daily</a>. Luckily, any of you who are itching to see <em>Nailed</em> needn't worry. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117985507.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562"><em>Variety</em></a> reports that ThinkFilm (part of Capitol Films) has resumed shooting (and will hopefully have enough cash to finish it).<br /><br />But this is part of a bigger problem: <em>Nailed</em> wasn't the only film hit with funding issues. <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/capitols-money-woes-with-bad-meat-movie-shut-down-suddenly-friday-too/">A number</a> of Capitol projects have been stopped or delayed due to lack of funds. ThinkFilm failed to pay Alex Gibney his owed fees for <em>Taxi to the Dark Side</em>. Flicks like <em>Bad Meat</em> were shut down. <em>Then She Found Me's</em> paper ad campaign hit a snag when there was no money for ads. You know you have serious money issues when you can't even get enough for your ad campaigns.<br /><br />And now they're heading to Cannes with films from <em>The Edge of Love</em> to <em>The Oxford Murders</em>. There's a lot of interesting films attached to this company, but my head has got "Another One Bites the Dust" playing for ThinkFilm and Capitol.<br /><br />Thoughts?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/14/capitol-films-might-want-to-thinkmoney-not-thinkfilm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1194062/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/14/capitol-films-might-want-to-thinkmoney-not-thinkfilm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Bad Meat</category><category>BadMeat</category><category>Capitol Films</category><category>CapitolFilms</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Nailed</category><category>Then She Found Me</category><category>ThenSheFoundMe</category><category>ThinkFilm</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Picturehouse on the Way Out?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/picturehouse-on-the-way-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/picturehouse-on-the-way-out/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/picturehouse-on-the-way-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-independent-pictures/" rel="tag">Warner Independent Pictures</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/other-festivals/" rel="tag">Other Festivals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/picturehouse.jpg" />Near the end of last week, <em>Defamer</em> <a href="http://defamer.com/386354/two-months-after-its-oscar-win-could-picturehouse-be-closing-its-doors">spread the rumor </a>that <a href="http://www.picturehouse.com/">Picturehouse</a>, once the indie arm of <a href="http://www.newline.com/">New Line Cinema </a>and currently dangling from the edge of the hulking entity known as <a href="http://www2.warnerbros.com/main/homepage/homepage.html">Warner Bros.</a>, has its days numbered. Now that New Line is history and Warners, like many studios, has faced increasing cutbacks, it may give short shrift to the shingles responsible for handling artier fare. Along with Picturehouse, this also includes Warner Independent Pictures, whose recent release slate includes David Gordon Green's magnificent <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/snow-angels/27512/main"><em>Snow Angels</em></a>. <br /><br /><em>Defamer</em> suggested that Picturehouse president <a href="http://www.indiewire.com/biz/biz_050513picture.html">Bob Berney</a> might wind up at WIP or head up a new, currently anonymous company. On Friday, <em>Variety</em>'s Anne Thompson <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117984972.html?categoryid=2508&amp;cs=1">put it in more coherent terms</a>: It appears quite likely that WIP and Picturehouse will merge together as a single company, with current WIP president Polly Cohen working alongside Berney. Whatever happens, let's just hope that the final result still leaves room for the sharp selection of independent and foreign titles that Picturehouse has handled since its birth three years ago. <em>Defamer</em> points out that Marion Cotillard's unexpected Oscar win for <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/la-vie-en-rose/26837/main"><em>La Vie en Rose</em></a> matters less than the flop of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/run-fat-boy-run/27011/main"><em>Run, Fatboy, Run</em></a>, while the John Simpson-directed horror film <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/amusement/28290/main"><em>Amusement</em></a> might get dumped on DVD. It was just last year, however, that the company helped edgy fare like <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-orphanage/29692/main"><em>The Orphanage</em></a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/rocket-science/25914/main"><em>Rocket Science</em></a> get the sort of release most studios would never try. Let's hope that bravery lives on, somewhere.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117984972.html?categoryid=2508&amp;cs=1>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/picturehouse-on-the-way-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1186580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/05/picturehouse-on-the-way-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>amusement</category><category>bob berney</category><category>bob-berney</category><category>BobBerney</category><category>defamer</category><category>el orfanato</category><category>ElOrfanato</category><category>la vie en rose</category><category>LaVieEnRose</category><category>marion cotillard</category><category>MarionCotillard</category><category>picturehouse</category><category>rocket science</category><category>RocketScience</category><category>run</category><category>run fat boy</category><category>run fat boy run</category><category>run fatboy run</category><category>RunFatBoy</category><category>RunFatboyRun</category><category>snow angel</category><category>snow angels</category><category>SnowAngel</category><category>SnowAngels</category><category>the orphanage</category><category>the orphanage poster</category><category>TheOrphanage</category><category>TheOrphanagePoster</category><category>warner bros</category><category>warner brothers</category><category>WarnerBros</category><category>WarnerBrothers</category><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Discuss: Is Hollywood Misogynistic?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/faris.jpg" alt="" style="width: 243px; height: 183px;" />In these supposedly progressive times, gender equality is one of those touchy issues relegated to the last paragraph of a trend piece nobody reads. When <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/03/fan-rant-katherine-heigl-calls-knocked-up-sexist/">Katherine Heigl suggested to <em>Vanity Fair</em> </a>that <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/judd-apatow/188203/main">Judd Apatow</a>'s movies were sexist, the assertion came across like an after-the-fact shrug of acceptance. Ever the galvanizing provocateur, <em>New York Times</em> critic Manohla Dargis <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/movies/moviesspecial/04dargi.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">confronts the issue head-on</a> with a thorough analysis of the gender bias in this year's summer blockbusters. <br /><br />With "Iron Man, Batman, Big Angry Green Man" and other massive expressions of virility invading the box office, female roles appear to be relegated to the back of the multiplex. Dargis touches on the rumors that Warner Bros head Jeff Robinov <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/warners-robinoff-gets-in-catfight-with-girls/">believes no woman has been able to sell a movie</a> since <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/julia-roberts/60634/main">Julia Roberts</a> (a point that <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/natalie-portman/197461/main">Natalie Portman</a> might contest, but not <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/paris-hilton/358949/main">Paris Hilton</a>) before sizing up numerous upcoming studio releases, with particular attention paid to <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/anna-faris/277709/main">Anna Faris</a>, "who could be the next <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/person/32908/Judy-Holliday?inline=nyt-per" title="">Judy Holliday</a> but without the right material will, alas, probably end up the next Brittany Murphy." It's the kind of pronouncement that hits you in gut.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Discuss: Is Hollywood Misogynistic?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/movies/moviesspecial/04dargi.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1185883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/04/is-hollywood-misogynistic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>amy poehler</category><category>AmyPoehler</category><category>anna faris</category><category>AnnaFaris</category><category>baby mama</category><category>BabyMama</category><category>batman</category><category>brittany murphy</category><category>BrittanyMurphy</category><category>film critic</category><category>film criticism</category><category>FilmCritic</category><category>FilmCriticism</category><category>gregg araki</category><category>GreggAraki</category><category>iron man</category><category>iron man movie photos</category><category>IronMan</category><category>IronManMoviePhotos</category><category>judd apatow</category><category>JuddApatow</category><category>judy holliday</category><category>JudyHolliday</category><category>julia roberts</category><category>JuliaRoberts</category><category>katherine heigel wed...</category><category>katherine heigl</category><category>katherine heigle</category><category>KatherineHeigelWed...</category><category>KatherineHeigl</category><category>KatherineHeigle</category><category>manola dargis</category><category>ManolaDargis</category><category>misogynistic</category><category>misogyny</category><category>misogynyinfilm</category><category>natalie portman</category><category>NataliePortman</category><category>new york times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>paris hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>smiley face</category><category>SmileyFace</category><category>the dark knight</category><category>the incredible hulk</category><category>TheDarkKnight</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>tina fey</category><category>TinaFey</category><category>vanity fair</category><category>VanityFair</category><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Matt Dentler Steps Down from SXSW</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/matt-dentler-steps-down-from-sxsw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/matt-dentler-steps-down-from-sxsw/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/matt-dentler-steps-down-from-sxsw/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sxsw/" rel="tag">SXSW</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/festival-reports/" rel="tag">Festival Reports</a></p><p><img height="90" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/03/sxswpinbox.jpg" width="390" align="middle" border="1" /></p>
<p>Wow, this news threw me for a loop. According to indieWIRE, our mutual friend Matt Dentler, producer of the <strong>South By Southwest Film Festival</strong> since 2004, is <a href="http://www.indiewire.com/buzz/080413.html#012000">leaving his post</a> (and Austin) to move to New York City, where he will head the marketing and programming operations of Cinetic Media's new digital rights management unit. Replacing Dentler as SXSW producer will be <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0682770/">Janet Pierson</a>, long-time independent film producer and board member of the Austin Film Society.</p>
<p>I've never met Pierson (well, that I know of ... you do get introduced to so many people at film fests, it's hard to keep track of everyone sometimes ... ) but I feel like I know her, from watching the documentary <a href="javascript:void(0);/*1208200080083*/"><em>Reel Paradise</em></a>, which she made with her husband, John. That film documented the year the Piersons and their two children spent living on a remote island in Fiji running the only movie theater on the island. I also wrote last year about John Pierson <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/02/film-clips-pierson-moore-and-the-ethics-of-doc-filmmaking/">smacking down on Michael Moore</a>, whose film <em>Roger &amp; Me</em> was sold by the Piersons to Warner Brothers for the then-unheard-of sum of $3 million.</p>
<p>Janet Pierson has fantastic indie street cred, she's a passionate lover of independent film, and I'm sure she'll do a stellar job heading up SXSW. We at Cinematical extend our warmest welcome to her, and wish our friend Matt great luck and joy in his new endeavor. Matt is one of our favorite indie-film-world people, and we hope that he'll come back to SXSW every year to just enjoy the fest for a change, rather than running to and fro introducing films and shepherding talent around. We'll save you a seat at the Alamo, Matt, and there's a five-dollar milkshake with your name on it when we see you there.</p>
<p>*Update: Check out <a href="http://www.indiewire.com/biz/2008/04/festival_news_p.html">indieWIRE's well-informed piece</a> on Cinetic's plans for Dentler and Pierson on stepping into Dentler's shoes.</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/matt-dentler-steps-down-from-sxsw/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1166804/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/matt-dentler-steps-down-from-sxsw/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>janet pierson</category><category>matt dentler</category><category>south by southwest</category><category>SouthBySouthwest</category><category>sxsw</category><dc:creator>Kim Voynar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Buscemi and Tucci Start Their Own Production Company</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/11/buscemi-and-tucci-start-their-own-production-company/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/11/buscemi-and-tucci-start-their-own-production-company/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/11/buscemi-and-tucci-start-their-own-production-company/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/01/stevstan011108.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />First, they both took part in remakes of slain director Theo Van Gogh's Dutch films. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/steve-buscemi/9838/main">Steve Buscemi</a> took on <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0480269/"><em>Interview</em></a>, which had him helming and starring with tow-headed actress Sienna Miller in a story about a jaded political journalist sent to interview a B-rated actress. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/stanley-tucci/72023/main">Stanley Tucci</a> took on <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0480268/"><em>Blind Date</em></a>, the story of a married couple who roleplay a blind date -- which stars himself and Patricia Clarkson. The film was recently completed, and will have its premiere at Sundance this month. But aside from honoring Van Gogh, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117978852.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">Variety</a> reports that the actors have teamed up to start a film, television, and commercial production company called Olive Productions.<br /><br />With a plan to develop features that have budgets from $3 to $12 million, both the Tooch and Buscemi will produce, right, direct, and nab talent for the banner. They even have some projects already underway. Before the writer's strike began, Tucci and Nicholas Pileggi were working on an adaptation of Gay Talese's nonfiction book <em>Unto the Sons </em>for HBO. It should be a great move for both actors -- Buscemi really stepped up to the plate and proved his worth in Interview, and imagine Stanley will do the same thing this year at Sundance. Just imagine -- lots of new indie fare with the likes of Tooch and Steve. I'm sold!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117978852.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/11/buscemi-and-tucci-start-their-own-production-company/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1084305/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/11/buscemi-and-tucci-start-their-own-production-company/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Olive Productions</category><category>OliveProductions</category><category>Stanley Tucci</category><category>StanleyTucci</category><category>Steve Buscemi</category><category>SteveBuscemi</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>What's Become of Elizabeth Avellan?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/01/whats-become-of-elizabeth-avellan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/01/whats-become-of-elizabeth-avellan/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/01/whats-become-of-elizabeth-avellan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/10/avellan100107.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Last year, along with the buzz of blood and chaos, <em>Grindhouse</em> brought rumors of marital difficulties. Officially, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001675/">Robert Rodriguez</a> and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0042882/">Elizabeth Avellan</a> have <a href="http://sev.prnewswire.com/film-motion-picture/20070406/NYF04006042007-1.html">stated</a> that they were split well before the making of the movie, and that all was amicable. <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/category?blogid=7&amp;cat=271">Rumors</a>, however, have also been circulating about Rose McGowan's <a href="http://www.glitteratigossip.com/glitterati/2007/04/rose_mcgowan_ro.html">involvement</a>, which quickly went from a "professional relationship," to a hand-holding appearance at Cannes. Yet another case of the long-term partner getting dumped for the younger actress -- I guess not all men can be Maxwell Caulfield. Anyhow, Avellan recently talked with the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/movies/30join.html?ref=movies"><em>New York Times</em></a> about where things lay post-separation, both for her production company with her ex, Troublemaker Studios, and her future solo work. <br /><br />The company will continue to run as-is, in accordance with earlier claims, but it looks like both are going to branch out to separate projects. For the first time, she's working with a director other than Rodriguez and is bringing Jonathan Jakubowicz's <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1064899/"><em>Queen of the South</em></a> to the screen <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/29/warner-bros-prepping-female-scarface-maybe-for-jlo/">for Warner Independent Pictures</a>. She says: "I didn't want Robert to feel like I wasn't giving 150 percent, like any producer would do. So I'd not talk about this or that. Now I feel free to mention some of the things that I'm doing."<br /><br />It's both a freeing and eerie statement -- one that speaks well for her future, but sadly of her past. Hopefully this is the beginning of some time in the spotlight for Avellan. As the piece notes, <em>The Hollywood Reporter</em> had listed a <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/features/indepth/e3i08b80be8ba1477a771eb6d51d93df981">Latino Power 50</a> this year, but while Rodriguez was listed third, she wasn't included, nor mentioned. She's functioned under the radar for many years now, so hopefully the time has come to see her shine.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/movies/30join.html?ref=movies>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/01/whats-become-of-elizabeth-avellan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1002324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/01/whats-become-of-elizabeth-avellan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Elizabeth Avellan</category><category>ElizabethAvellan</category><category>Grindhouse</category><category>Queen of the South</category><category>QueenOfTheSouth</category><category>Robert Rodriguez</category><category>RobertRodriguez</category><category>Troublemaker Studios</category><category>TroublemakerStudios</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Hollywood Romances Bollywood &amp; The WB is 'Made in China'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/22/hollywood-romances-bollywood-and-the-wb-is-made-in-china/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/22/hollywood-romances-bollywood-and-the-wb-is-made-in-china/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/22/hollywood-romances-bollywood-and-the-wb-is-made-in-china/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/disney/" rel="tag">Disney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/08/bolly082207.jpg" />Being the second most populous nation, India is like this glittering Eden of box office potential -- one that Hollywood is desperately trying to break into. So far, Bollywood has stood relatively free from the foreign influence. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117970631.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">Variety</a> notes that Hollywood nabbed a whopping 85% of Spain's box office last year, while only 8% in India. I'd say - "Go, India!" but it looks like the tide is changing. Instead of continuing with plans for remakes and exportation, Hollywood studios are going to make Bollywood movies mainly for Indian audiences.<br /><br />Warner Brothers unveiled their first India production this week, an action comedy called <em>Made in China</em>. Directed by <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0012541/">Nikhil Advani</a> and written by <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm1356270/">Shridhar Raghavan</a>, the film stars <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0474774/">Akshay Kumar</a> as a "Mumbai cook who is mistaken for a martial-arts master as well as Indian model-turned-actress Deepika Padukone." It'll be filmed in Hindi and marks the first Indian production to shoot in China. (But will their censors be into the fantastical elements?) It's also said to be pretty pricey for Bollywood standards.<br /><br />Obviously, Hollywood entering Bollywood has its pluses -- huge distribution power, money and technology to bring new waves in cinema, such as Disney's plan to make yearly toons for the nation -- the first to be <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt1050739/"><em>Roadside Romeo</em></a>. On the flip side, it was inspiring to see a powerful local film industry doing well without Hollywood. I'm all for international co-productions, but I'd hate to be posting in a few years that Hollywood has upped its box office take in India to numbers that rival Spain's. Check out the <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117970631.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">Variety</a> piece for more details.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117970631.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/22/hollywood-romances-bollywood-and-the-wb-is-made-in-china/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/970910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/22/hollywood-romances-bollywood-and-the-wb-is-made-in-china/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Dimension Films President Takes the Bullet for 'Grindhouse'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/17/dimension-films-president-takes-the-bullet-for-grindhouse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/17/dimension-films-president-takes-the-bullet-for-grindhouse/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/17/dimension-films-president-takes-the-bullet-for-grindhouse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-weinstein-co/" rel="tag">The Weinstein Co.</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/quentin-tarantino/" rel="tag">Quentin Tarantino</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/04/grindhousesplitposter.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Over at <em>Deadline Hollywood Daily</em>, Nikki Finke <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/update-richard-saperstein-saying-hes-out/">has been investigating</a> the employment status of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0764552/">Richard Saperstein</a>, who supposedly still works for Dimension Films. Saperstein is/was the president of production over at Dimension, which I'm sure you all know is part of The Weinstein Co. Finke had heard a rumor that Saperstein was canned, probably because of the disappointing <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0462322/">Grindhouse</a> </em>box office. Supposedly, he was even telling friends that he got fired, but then later he found out he didn't actually lose his job. According to Finke's sources, the confusion has to do with Saperstein's contract with Dimension, which either lasts another 18 months or as long as another four years. So, maybe the guy was relieved of his position but hasn't technically lost his job. In a statement from The Weinstein Co. to Finke, Saperstein was said to still be "an employee of the company." Of course, that doesn't say he's still the president of production.</p>
<p>Other tidbits that Finke points out about Saperstein's reign at Dimension include his involvement in the recent hit <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0450385/">1408</a></em>, which should be redeeming him for <em>Grindhouse</em>, which certainly shouldn't have been his fault anyway (who do you think has more influence with <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0000233/">Tarantino</a> and <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0001675/">Rodriguez</a> -- <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005544/">Harvey</a> and <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0918424/">Bob Weinstein</a> or Saperstein?). Also, Saperstein reportedly just snagged Dimension the rights to remake David Cronenberg's <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0081455/">Scanners</a></em>. Whether or not Saperstein is still employed at Dimension, it appears that lawyers may end up involved, and we will probably see him leave the studio anyway. Then maybe we'll hear about the Weinstein's continued plans to fix the reputation of their slow-going company, of which Dimension should be doing the better business, like it was doing when it was a part of Miramax. Dimension is probably doing better than The Weinstein Co. as a distributor, but maybe it could layoff the sequels and horror remakes and be even more successful. </p>
<p> </p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/17/dimension-films-president-takes-the-bullet-for-grindhouse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/942292/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/17/dimension-films-president-takes-the-bullet-for-grindhouse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>dimension films</category><category>DimensionFilms</category><category>film</category><category>harvey weinstein</category><category>HarveyWeinstein</category><category>movie</category><category>nikki finke</category><category>NikkiFinke</category><category>richard saperstein</category><category>RichardSaperstein</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Lars von Trier is So Nietzsche</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/03/lars-von-trier-is-so-nietzsche/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/03/lars-von-trier-is-so-nietzsche/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/03/lars-von-trier-is-so-nietzsche/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/07/nietzsche070307.jpg" />In May, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/14/lars-von-trier-says-depression-may-have-killed-his-career/">Christopher Campbell posted</a> about <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0001885/">Lars von Trier's</a> depression, and how the director fears it will hurt or kill his career. See, the director was hospitalized earlier this year, and while he's now out, he can't focus on movies and the affliction has left him "like a blank sheet of paper." It's a bit ironic that this comes in the midst of von Trier's comedies, and not his emotionally heavy work like <em>Dogville</em> and <em>Manderlay</em>. <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0469754/">The Boss of it All</a></em> was recently released in the states, and Cinematical's  <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/26/review-the-boss-of-it-all/">Ryan Stewart described</a> it as a "success, a refreshing change from the ponderous 'Grace trilogy,'" and that "Danish subtitles do nothing to slow down the laughs."<br /><br />And there's even another comedy on the way, which proves that he's still got a sense of humor, even in the throes of depression. <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0482358/"><em>Erik Nietzsche, The Early Years</em></a> is a comedic drama about Erik Nietzsche, "an intelligent, but in many ways inexperienced, shy young man who is convinced he wants to be a film director." He enrolls in the Danish National Film School, entering "a world of angry, unhelpful tutors, weird fellow students and unwritten rules," which make Erik feel "like a foreigner in the film industry." As <a href="http://www.twitchfilm.net/archives/010562.html">Twitch</a> recaps -- the director was originally tapped only to write the film, which is based on his own experiences. Now does the premise make sense? The original director, Lone Schefig has since dropped out and new director <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0862002/">Jacob Thuesen</a> has taken over the helm, but Lars is no longer credited as screenwriter -- <a href="http://www.dfi.dk/english/Danish+films/FeatureFilmsByYear/filmFact.htm?FilmID=17694">Erik Nietzsche is</a>. Ah, Lars, keep fighting. We need your entertaining, von Trier view of the world.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.twitchfilm.net/archives/010562.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/03/lars-von-trier-is-so-nietzsche/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/932115/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/03/lars-von-trier-is-so-nietzsche/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>Erik Nietzsche, The Early Years</category><category>ErikNietzsche,TheEarlyYears</category><category>films</category><category>Jacob Thuesen</category><category>JacobThuesen</category><category>Lars von Trier</category><category>LarsVonTrier</category><category>movies</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Disney Honcho Ousted for Screwing Up Planned 'Tinkerbell' Movie</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/22/disney-honcho-ousted-for-screwing-up-planned-tinkerbell-movie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/22/disney-honcho-ousted-for-screwing-up-planned-tinkerbell-movie/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/22/disney-honcho-ousted-for-screwing-up-planned-tinkerbell-movie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/06/tinkerbell062107.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Off with her head! Er, wait that's the wrong movie -- one of the few that Disney didn't "honor" with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Disney_direct-to-video_films">direct-to-DVD sequel</a>. As for other classics, they weren't so lucky. At first, it seemed like only the more recent animated hits would be affected. In the 90's, we got videos like <em>The Return of Jafar </em>and <em>Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas</em>. Of course, this was a short-lived blessing as old-school films started getting picked up. In 2001 it was <em>Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure</em>. Then there was <em>Cinderella II: Dreams Come True </em>(followed this year by a second sequel). Then, the whole thing became unstoppable and almost nothing was sacred -- <em>101 Dalmations, Bambi</em> and <em>The Fox and the Hound</em> all got sequels. Now, amazingly, Disney has decided to <a href="http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7007720817">halt future sequels</a> citing inferiority to the originals -- <em>duh</em>!<br /><br />Some sources, like the previous AHN link, say it's the crappy quality, but over at <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117967400.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">Variety</a>, there's a little different news about the who and what of the switch. Disney has sacked Sharon Morrill, who has been head of DisneyToons direct-to-DVD work for a while now. She's not completely gone, however, as a Disney rep says that she's being moved to some sort of "special projects" work, whatever that means. The reasoning behind her dismissal, according to V -- the costs for the upcoming <em>Tinker Bell</em> adaptation have skyrocketed to the not-so-costly $50 million (AHN says it's $30 million). Apparently the movie has had around two dozen script versions and a ton of different directors attached. To top that off, sources say that she's not getting along so well with Pixar heads, since Disney bought the company last year. <br /><br />What the exact story is, remains to be seen. I would imagine that if this was all about Morrill, then Disney wouldn't be bringing their DVD sequels to an end, they'd just find someone to replace her. Whatever the exact numbers and rationale are, I can't help but be a little relieved that it's coming to an end, and relieved that Disney CCO John Lasseter acknowledged that not only are the sequels inferior, but they "erode" the brand. Quality over money...wonders never cease!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117967400.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/22/disney-honcho-ousted-for-screwing-up-planned-tinkerbell-movie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/923879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/06/22/disney-honcho-ousted-for-screwing-up-planned-tinkerbell-movie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>Disney</category><category>films</category><category>movies</category><category>Tinker Bell</category><category>TinkerBell</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Hollywood Short of Female Power?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/04/27/is-hollywood-short-of-female-power/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/04/27/is-hollywood-short-of-female-power/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/04/27/is-hollywood-short-of-female-power/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/04/nanny042707.jpg" alt="" />Where is the modern woman? A number of times of the last few years, I've asked friends to list films that center on modern, successful working women where floofy romance is the center of the plot. While I refuse to drown in the sappy romcom or family fare, I always have to have my blind eye ready when I want to watch something that in some way either reflects my life, or inspires me to push forward. I've ignored the outfits and silliness of <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0159206/"><em>Sex and the City</em></a>, the sexual dysfunction of <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0298408/"><em>Laurel Canyon</em></a> and just how old <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0080319/"><em>9 to 5</em></a> is.<br /><br />Now, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/movies/26wome.html?ex=1335240000&amp;en=7a61b3212452e2ef&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">New York Times</a> has put out an article about <em>Hollywood's Shortage of Female Power</em>. I click on the link, expecting something similar to what I typed above, but that's not what I got. Perhaps it is best summed up with this: "While Hollywood has not stopped making films appealing to women and girls, as evidenced by recent and coming releases like <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0758766/"><em>Music and Lyrics</em></a>, <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0479500/"><em>Nancy Drew</em></a> and <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0489237/"><em>The Nanny Diaries</em></a>, women here worry that the future will not be so bright." While I don't think I could knock the ever-tough Drew, since I grew up reading about her, that has to be one of the most reductive thoughts that I've read in a while. By now I'd think that women have come far enough to be more than a demographic itching for light romance and childcare. Yes, "female power" is lessening behind the scenes as a number of top, female studio heads like Gail Berman have left their positions. However, that's not synonymous with "female" floofyness.<br /><br />But that's all that the Times discussion is based on. Another quote has producer Lindsay Doran saying: "You don't see companies saying, 'More than half of this population is women, we should design a slate to come up with movies like <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0452594/"><em>The Break-Up</em></a> and <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0458352/">The Devil Wears Prada</a>.</em>'" Maybe that's because women are more than flipping crazy ex-girlfriends or girls starving their already-thin frame to fit into the latest fashions? Could it be, perchance, that women want films that give them more credit? Give us balance, people!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/movies/26wome.html?ex=1335240000&amp;en=7a61b3212452e2ef&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/04/27/is-hollywood-short-of-female-power/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/883784/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/04/27/is-hollywood-short-of-female-power/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>films</category><category>movies</category><category>women in film</category><category>WomenInFilm</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bunim Murray Creates Film Division</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/bunim-murray-creates-film-division/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/bunim-murray-creates-film-division/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/bunim-murray-creates-film-division/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/03/bunim31907.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />I just know that you were itching for a <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0103520/"><em>Real World</em></a> movie, or maybe a <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0914829/"><em>Bad Girls Club</em></a> feature film, or even Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie on a huge screen in a cinematic version of <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0362153/"><em>The Simple Life</em></a>. Can't you see it? Real people tackling taboos while wearing barely-there clothing. "Hot gals" and "randy guys" having "heated clashes." <em>Jackass</em> did it, so why not the old, long-living reality show from MTV, <em>The Real World</em>, or any of the other creations of <a href="http://www.bunim-murray.com/">Bunim-Murray Productions</a>?<br /><br />The reality-centric television business has <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117961373.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">started a documentary division</a> to be run by<a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0022424/"> Sasha Alpert</a>, B-M casting director. Head honcho <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0615086/">Jon Murray</a> says: "<em>The Real World</em> is just a different, more commercial way of doing a documentary," so they decided they had a passion for doc filmmaking and should look beyond television. Well, sure. It's more commercial in that they took a show about putting intelligent people together to clash and learn from each other and over each season made the show more about hot bods, sex and partying than discussion and any sort of reality. However, their first feature is a film by Tricia Regan called <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0481580/"><em>Autism: The Musical</em></a>. It's an interesting choice, and not what I'd expect. I can only hope that the future will be as promising, and that their feature documentaries don't become PG or R-rated <em>Girls Gone Wild</em> adventures.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117961373.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/bunim-murray-creates-film-division/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/855619/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/bunim-murray-creates-film-division/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Bunim-Murray</category><category>cinematical</category><category>films</category><category>movies</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Thompson on Hollywood Debuts at Variety</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/thompson-on-hollywood-debuts-at-variety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/thompson-on-hollywood-debuts-at-variety/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/thompson-on-hollywood-debuts-at-variety/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img height="150" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/03/thompson-at-hollywood.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Just a couple weeks ago or so, film journalist Anne Thompson, former Deputy Film Editor over at <em>The Hollywood Reporter</em>, jumped ship to <em>Variety</em> (along with editor Cynthia Littleton). Now Thompson has settled into her new digs as a deputy editor, writing a weekly column and a daily blog -- <em>Thompson on Hollywood</em>. Kicking things off, Thompson ran a piece on how the success of 300 "<a href="http://www.ukgaynews.org.uk/Archive/07/March/1901.htm">could rewrite the rules of comic book movies</a>". On her new blog, Thompson writes about the<a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2007/03/writer_lethem_m.html"> 19-member writer's co-op</a> that's formed at Warner Bros., how Showest in Las Vegas was and how the highlight of the fest <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2007/03/hairspray_rocks.html">was <em>Hairspray</em></a>, and other such Hollywood goodies.<br /><br />It's good to see Thompson up and running so quickly on Variety, which seems to be making a move towards more web-based and blogging efforts, perhaps to reach a greater audience outside the industry. Variety scored well in snagging Thompson (I bet some folks at The Hollywood Reporter were seriously irritated at losing her). She's a savvy journalist who does her homework, busts her butt covering great inside topics I'd otherwise probably never read about, and has succeeded in achieving remarkable credibility among other film journalists and Hollywood industry folks. Thompson's smart, savvy writing will be a welcome breath of fresh air over at Variety. We here at Cinematical welcome her to her new gig, and look forward to reading her future words of Hollywood wisdom.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/thompson-on-hollywood-debuts-at-variety/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/855581/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/19/thompson-on-hollywood-debuts-at-variety/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>anne thompson</category><category>AnneThompson</category><category>cinematical</category><category>cynthia littleton</category><category>CynthiaLittleton</category><category>film</category><category>indie film</category><category>movie</category><category>variety</category><dc:creator>Kim Voynar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Bites: 'Invisible' Inspiration, Disney Exhibit and Seghatchian to Head UKFC</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/02/indie-bites-invisible-inspiration-disney-exhibit-and-seghatc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/02/indie-bites-invisible-inspiration-disney-exhibit-and-seghatc/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/02/indie-bites-invisible-inspiration-disney-exhibit-and-seghatc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/03/seghatch3207.jpg" alt="" />Some news for the weekend:<br />
<ul>
    <li>I don't see the connection, but the latest heist flick to hit the pike is inspired by Ralph Ellison's racial classic, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_Man"><em>Invisible Man</em></a>.<em> Invisible</em>, written by <em>The Watcher</em> and <em>Four Brothers </em>scribe <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0254213/">David Elliot</a>, is about a masterful bank heist and the obsession that a female cop has with catching a mysterious con man, who I presume is responsible for the heist. Was the mere word "invisible" the inspiration? Will the crime flick also deal with racial issues? I have no idea. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960413.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">Infinity Media has grabbed the project</a>, and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2258390/">Lance Larson</a> will direct it.</li>
    <li>While <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/19/dali-and-disneys-destino-to-screen-in-london/"><em>Destino</em></a> is getting closer to its DVD release, it will be part of a <a href="http://www.showbizdata.com/contacts/picknews.cfm?id=43528">Disney art exhibit in Montreal</a>, which runs from March 8 - June 24. The Montreal Museum of Fine Arts will have, on-loan, about 300 pieces of art from the Disney archives, and most have never been publically displayed. The exhibit is called <a href="http://www.mbam.qc.ca/en/expositions/exposition_125.html"><em>Once Upon a Time</em></a>, and it focuses on the many sources that inspired the world of Disney. This includes original work by Disney studio artists, paintings, sculptures, drawings, photographs, film clips and other items. Basically, it's a must-see for old-school Disney fans.<br /></li>
    <li>The U.K. Film Council Development Fund has been busy. Just over a week after releasing <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/02/22/the-latest-films-helped-by-uk-film-council-development-fund/">the latest round of films</a> to receive money from the Fund, Jenny Borgars has stepped down as head. <em>Harry Potter</em> producer <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0782036/">Tanya Seghatchian</a> has been <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960424.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">named as her replacement</a>. Seghatchian is known as the executive who first brought Rowling's work to the attention of David Heyman, and has worked closely on the development of the franchise. In 2005, she was one of Variety's <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117928863.html?categoryid=2066&amp;cs=1&amp;query=%2210+producers+to+watch%22+2005">10 Producers to Watch</a>, and they seem to have been right! It'll be interesting to see what she does with the Fund.<br /></li>
</ul><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960413.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562>Read</a> | <a href=http://www.showbizdata.com/contacts/picknews.cfm?id=43528>Read</a> | <a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960424.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/02/indie-bites-invisible-inspiration-disney-exhibit-and-seghatc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/844559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/03/02/indie-bites-invisible-inspiration-disney-exhibit-and-seghatc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>David Elliot</category><category>DavidElliot</category><category>Destino</category><category>Disney</category><category>films</category><category>Invisible</category><category>Lance Larson</category><category>LanceLarson</category><category>movies</category><category>Tanya Seghatchian</category><category>TanyaSeghatchian</category><category>UKFC</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Canadian Filmmakers Fight Back at THINKFilm</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/18/canadian-filmmakers-fight-back-at-thinkfilm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/18/canadian-filmmakers-fight-back-at-thinkfilm/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/18/canadian-filmmakers-fight-back-at-thinkfilm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/thinkfilm/" rel="tag">ThinkFilm</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/01/egg011807.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Right now, THINKFilm has a lot to bask in. <em>Born Into Brothels</em> scored them an Oscar, <em>Murderball</em> garnered them an Oscar nomination, <em>Half Nelson</em> has gotten all sorts of praise and they have two documentaries getting buzz at Sundance -- <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0912599/"><em>War Dance</em></a> and the equine flick, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/08/thinkfilm-acquires-horse-loving-zoo/"><em>Zoo</em></a>. However, behind the spotlight there is increasing anger. In October, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117952514.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">the company was sold to American entrepreneur</a>, David Bergstein, who owns Capitol Films. While this might mean a many wonderful things for the company on the whole, it doesn't for the Canadian filmmakers who were grabbed by the company before the sale.<br /><br />The acquisition has presented a lot of problems to the Canadian films under THINKFilm's belt, and situations are only getting worse as time goes on. As <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070117.wthinkfilm17/BNStory/Entertainment/home">The Globe and Mail</a> reports, there are approximately 50 titles in limbo and after months without response, a group of the filmmakers are retaining lawyers to try to free their films from the company. Why is all of this a problem? Although president Jeff Sackman was planning to sell the titles in question within a month of the sale, the deals went nowhere and months have passed. Now the filmmakers are getting nervous in the face of CanCon financial issues. <br /><br />To top off the indie films' money worries are distribution problems -- especially for <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0461946/"><em>Everything's Gone Green</em></a>, the Douglas Coupland-penned comedy headed by <em>Joey</em> star <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0182455/">Paulo Costanzo</a>. Under Canadian law, it is now US-owned, so the company cannot distribute Canadian films in Canada -- and the US release is set for April, which means that times-a-ticking. I don't want to have to drive to Buffalo to see a Canadian movie, and so I urge THINKFilm to work things out with these Canadian filmmakers already.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070117.wthinkfilm17/BNStory/Entertainment/home>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/18/canadian-filmmakers-fight-back-at-thinkfilm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/738397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/18/canadian-filmmakers-fight-back-at-thinkfilm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>Everything's Gone Green</category><category>Everything'sGoneGreen</category><category>films</category><category>movies</category><category>THINKFilm</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>From the Editor's Desk, Jan. 11, 2007: Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/from-the-editors-desk-jan-11-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/from-the-editors-desk-jan-11-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/from-the-editors-desk-jan-11-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sundance/" rel="tag">Sundance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/from-the-editors-desk/" rel="tag">From the Editor's Desk</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/01/editordesklogo.jpg" alt="" />At this point, stories about 2006 are <em>so </em>2006, and everyone's gearing up for Sundance. You chat with your movie friends about Sundance films in impossibly reductive terms -- "Are you gonna cover the horse movie, or should I do that and you can see <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0415856/">Dakota Fanning</a> go through hell?" "Wow, they're press screening the documentary about the Rape of Nanking at 10:00 PM; party!" -- and try to get your interviews and socializing all jammed into the schedule. It's also a time of great changes: I'll be stepping down as editor in Chief of Cinematical at the end of January. Ryan Stewart will be taking over, and Erik Davis and Kim Voynar will be continuing in their roles; I'll still write for Cine, and getting back to more writing is exactly why I'm making this move. It's been a lot of fun, but at the end of the day, I think that Cinematical -- and myself -- are best served by this move. <br /><br />Hope you're well, <br /><br />J.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/from-the-editors-desk-jan-11-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/734526/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/from-the-editors-desk-jan-11-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>James Rocchi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Shakeups Hit Momentum</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/shakeups-hit-momentum/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/shakeups-hit-momentum/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/shakeups-hit-momentum/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/01/moving_boxes.jpg" />I love the European term "redundant," don't you? As in the phrase, "I say, old chap, I'm afraid you've been made redundant. Security has packed your worldly possessions into this cardboard box for you, you'll be home in time foe tea. Ta-ta!" It sounds ever so much more polite than "you're fired." I don't know if there's some weird alignment of the stars, or if there's just something about post-holiday grumpiness that leads to people getting canned, but yesterday's shakeup at Paramount wasn't the only rearranging of things in the works, it seems.<br /><br />Variety reports this morning that over across the Atlantic, <a href="http://www.momentumpictures.co.uk/flash">Momentum Pictures</a> managing director <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117957170.html?categoryId=19&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=3078">Xavier Marchand has been "suspended"</a> -- what the hell that means, exactly, no one is saying -- with former Sony exec Richard Napper (who was himself made redundant by Sony not so long ago) named interim managing director effective immediately. Meanwhile, Momentum's senior VP of European operations, Yu-Fai Suen, was made redundant.<br /><br />Variety hints that there may be more to the story: CanWest Communications is negotiating to buy Alliance Atlantis Communications, which owns 51% of Motion Picture Distribution, Momentum's parent co, in a deal that would give the Canadian arm of Goldman Sachs that 51% stake in MPD. Marchard, along with former MPD execs Patrice Theroux and Victor Loewy, tried to negotiate a management buy-out last summer.<br /><br />No idea what the real behind-the-scenes story is, but with all these upheavals and redundancies, there's got to be a good Hollywood back-stabbing flick in there somewhere ...<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/shakeups-hit-momentum/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/734367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/11/shakeups-hit-momentum/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>momentum pictures</category><category>MomentumPictures</category><category>motion picture distribution</category><category>movie</category><category>xavier marchand</category><dc:creator>Kim Voynar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>